JULY 16 2006 BREAKING NEWS
IRS & Congress Conspire to Destroy
the Offer in
Compromise Program
Nine months ago we warned you
that Congress was about to make the Offer program much more difficult for the
average taxpayer. Unfortunately, that proposed legislation passed, the President
signed the bill and today, that law went into effect. Now, almost every taxpayer
submitting an Offer in Compromise is required to pay a non-refundable deposit
equal to 20% of the Offer in Compromise amount. If the Offer is rejected, the
IRS keeps the deposit and applies it to the tax debt.
Under this legislation, is
there any reason whatsoever for the IRS to accept any Offer? Not much.
eTaxes.com
believes we'll still get our Offers accepted because we only submit good offers,
but frankly, I'm not certain. Fortunately, we did learn today that National Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olson has
proposed that this law be repealed, but the likelihood of that is very, very
slim. IRS Commission Mark Everson wants to kill Offers entirely and this is a
close as he can get to doing so. We'll have more on the practical effects of the
new law in the coming weeks.
On January 20th, 2006, while attending an IRS
Tax Practitioner Seminar with the California Society of Enrolled Agents, an IRS
Offer in Compromise Group Manager based in Oakland told us that the IRS was
making another drastic cut in the number of Revenue Officers working Offer
cases. There will be just 153 Offer specialists nationwide, a massive drop of
86% from the high of 1,100 Offer specialists just a few years ago.
These Offer specialists will be headquartered
in just three offices, one each in California, Texas and Florida. Since IRS
Commissioner Mark Everson despises the Offer program and clearly wishes to do
away with all Offers, this is not at all a surprise.
In October 2005, we told you that Congress was close to
making to the Offer in Compromise program much more difficult for the average
taxpayer. Fortunately, the provision of the bill which would have required a 20%
down payment with any lump-sum Offer was killed.
We received
email from the National Association of Enrolled Agents (NAEA) that the provision
has been reborn and is "being considered for inclusion in either the budget
reconciliation bill or as part of legislation to pay for hurricane relief, each
of which is likely to be acted on in the near future".
According to NAEA President Frank Degen in a
letter dated September 29 sent to Congressman Jim Ramstad, Chairman of the
Oversight Subcommittee, "if enacted, the proposal would require a taxpayer
either to remit a 20 percent down payment with any lump sum offer or to make
regular payment of proposed OIC installment payments while IRS considers the
offer. Should IRS reject any offer, the agency would retain any monies remitted
under this requirement. While the proposal would repeal the $150 OIC user fee,
reduce time IRS has to accept an offer from 24 to 12 months (starting in 2010)
and create a task force to review the entire OIC program, enrolled agents
believe these benefits would be far outweighed by the so-called "good faith"
provisions of the proposal".
We strongly agree with Frank Degen and urge
Congress to kill this bad proposed legislation. As Frank notes, "With IRS
guaranteed monthly "good faith" payments, the provision may also actually have
the affect of slowing, rather than speeding IRS' OIC processing".
There is absolutely no doubt whatsoever that
if this is enacted into law, it WILL be the start of the death of the Offer in
Compromise program. IRS Commissioner Mark Everson has shown he wants to kill the
OIC program and this will, without any doubt whatsoever, be the start of that
process.
We urge you to contact your House of
Representatives member and Senator and urge them to kill this proposed
legislation.